Re: The silliness of max()

2010-03-07 Thread Darren Duncan
Jon Lang wrote: Moritz Lenz wrote: Please take a look at http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73356: rakudo: say max(1..5) rakudo c05478: OUTPUT«-Inf␤» * masak submits rakudobug for max(1..5) The weird thing is that it is right, according to the current spec. It says our multi max

Re: The silliness of max()

2010-03-07 Thread Jon Lang
Moritz Lenz wrote: > Please take a look at http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73356: > > rakudo: say max(1..5) > rakudo c05478: OUTPUT«-Inf␤» > * masak submits rakudobug for max(1..5) > > The weird thing is that it is right, according to the current spec. It says > >  our multi max( Or

The silliness of max()

2010-03-07 Thread Moritz Lenz
Please take a look at http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73356: rakudo: say max(1..5) rakudo c05478: OUTPUT«-Inf␤» * masak submits rakudobug for max(1..5) The weird thing is that it is right, according to the current spec. It says our multi max( Ordering @by, *...@values ) our mu