On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 01:41:30PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Luke Palmer wrote:
: >Seems reasonable. My generality alarm goes off when I realize that
: >you can't specify commutativity for two of the three args, but that's
: >fine because it's definitely a cpanable feature.
:
: IIRC, it's pos
Luke Palmer wrote:
Seems reasonable. My generality alarm goes off when I realize that
you can't specify commutativity for two of the three args, but that's
fine because it's definitely a cpanable feature.
IIRC, it's possible to embed one signature within another one; if the
embedded signature
On 1/16/07, Dave Whipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Synopsys 13 mentions an "is commutative" trait in its discussion of
operator overloading syntax:
> Binary operators may be declared as commutative:
>
>multi sub infix:<+> (Us $us, Them $them) is commutative {
>myadd($us,$them) }
Synopsys 13 mentions an "is commutative" trait in its discussion of
operator overloading syntax:
> Binary operators may be declared as commutative:
>
>multi sub infix:<+> (Us $us, Them $them) is commutative {
>myadd($us,$them) }
A few questions:
Is this restricted to only binary op
