David Storrs wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the one thing that all those
projects have in common...well...Perl? And isn't Larry the guy to
whom we owe the existence of Perl? I'm not fortunate enough to be
using Perl in my job, but I'm still more than happy to pony up for a
donation,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:21:58PM -0800, Austin Hastings wrote:
>
> --- David Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is something along the lines of the applied research vs basic
> > research question. What Larry is doing pretty much amounts to basic
> > research that will help all of these
--- David Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:21:08PM -0800, Damian Conway wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > Well, I'll be pretty interested to discover what cause is deemed
> more
> > > deserving than Larry, Perl 6 or Parrot. The P still stands for
> Perl,
> >
This is a valuable discussion, and I hope people will take this up on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as well.
Thanks,
John A
see me fulminate at http://www.jzip.org/
David Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:21:08PM -0800, Damian Conway wrote:
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> > Well, I'll be pretty interested to discover what cause is deemed more
>> > deserving than Larry, Perl 6 or Parrot. The P still stands for Perl,
>> > right?
>>
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:21:08PM -0800, Damian Conway wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > Well, I'll be pretty interested to discover what cause is deemed more
> > deserving than Larry, Perl 6 or Parrot. The P still stands for Perl,
> > right?
>
> True. But I suspect that TPF's position is that
