Re: TERN-discuss mailing list finally available

2002-11-23 Thread Simon Cozens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph F. Ryan) writes: > Are these people serious? What on earth is the point? I suggest a Tern versus Rindolf shootout. -- An algorithm must be seen to be believed. -- D.E. Knuth

Re: TERN-discuss mailing list finally available

2002-11-21 Thread Austin Hastings
They can't be very serious -- the archive link is dead. Or perhaps everyone agrees that something needs to be done, but no-one has any ideas? =Austin --- "Joseph F. Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > david wrote: > > > The brazen heresy continues... > > > > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listin

Re: TERN-discuss mailing list finally available

2002-11-20 Thread Joseph F. Ryan
david wrote: The brazen heresy continues... http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/TERN-discuss Are these people serious? What on earth is the point?

Re: TERN-discuss mailing list finally available

2002-11-20 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:07 PM -0600 11/20/02, david wrote: The brazen heresy continues... http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/TERN-discuss Perl 5, or perl 6? -- Dan --"it's like this"--- Dan Sugalski

TERN-discuss mailing list finally available

2002-11-20 Thread david
The brazen heresy continues... http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/TERN-discuss