On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:24:30PM -0400, Rick Delaney wrote:
: On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 06:20:44AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: > Yeah, they're lexical, just like in Perl 5.
:
: Not just like Perl 5, I hope. If it was then the above would print
: "d".
Yes, Perl 5 actually uses an autolocalizing f
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 06:20:44AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
> On 5/10/05, Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > sub foo() {
say $1;# undef?
> > "abc" ~~ /^(.)/; # $1 now "a"
> > }
> >
> > sub bar() {
> > "def" ~~ /^(.)/; # $1 now "d"
On 5/10/05, Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sub foo() {
> "abc" ~~ /^(.)/; # $1 now "a"
> }
>
> sub bar() {
> "def" ~~ /^(.)/; # $1 now "d"
> foo();
> say $1;# Outputs "d"
> }
>
> bar();
>
> # Correct (I hope so)?
Yeah, they're
Hi,
sub foo() {
"abc" ~~ /^(.)/; # $1 now "a"
}
sub bar() {
"def" ~~ /^(.)/; # $1 now "d"
foo();
say $1;# Outputs "d"
}
bar();
# Correct (I hope so)?
--Ingo
--
Linux, the choice of a GNU | Row, row, row your bits, gently down t
