On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:26:49AM +0100, TSa wrote:
: HaloO,
:
: Larry Wall wrote:
: >Um, I always thought that "is reserved" in a spec means "we don't have
: >the foggiest idea what we'll do with this, but we have a suspicion
: >that if we let people use this particular thing right now, we'll
:
HaloO,
Larry Wall wrote:
Um, I always thought that "is reserved" in a spec means "we don't have
the foggiest idea what we'll do with this, but we have a suspicion
that if we let people use this particular thing right now, we'll
regret it someday."
OK, but how official is theory.pod? I mean is
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:00:08PM +0100, TSa wrote:
: HaloO,
:
: S02 states "(Directly subscripting the type with either square brackets
: or curlies is reserved for various generic type-theoretic operations. In
: most other matters type names and package names are interchangeable.)"
:
: What
HaloO,
S02 states "(Directly subscripting the type with either square brackets
or curlies is reserved for various generic type-theoretic operations. In
most other matters type names and package names are interchangeable.)"
What are these type-theoretic operations? And what do directly
attache