> As my Con Law professor was fond of saying, "Horse hooey!"*
Camel cookies.
;-)
> These types of issues are not nearly so clear cut as many company's
> would have people believe. E.g., O'Reilly is book publisher that
> engages in the business of publishing and selling books for a
> profit. T
David Grove writes:
> Probably not if it had scales, webbed feet, a hookbill, antennae, a furry
> coontail, and udders. Otherwise, if it looks like a camel at all, it's
> considered a trademark violation. I remember someone (whether at O'Reilly or
> not I don't remember) saying that, even if it l
Dan Sugalski writes:
> I dunno. Color me unconvinced--I do use the <> enough in non-while context
> (and in non-implied while context) to make the whole idea of next feel
> rather... nasty. And $FOO.next? Yuck. Reading lines/records in is one of
> the most fundamental things one can do in a co
