On Sat, 01 Feb 2003 06:40, Garrett Goebel wrote:
> Or for the extremely thick:
> GOOD: Separate syntax for indexed vs. named lookups
> BAD: Same syntax with >= 2 contextual meanings
Or, another way to look at it;
GOOD: flexible, re-usable code that doesn't care if you change the key
type
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 09:40 AM, Garrett Goebel wrote:
Or for the extremely thick:
GOOD: Separate syntax for indexed vs. named lookups
BAD: Same syntax with >= 2 contextual meanings
Seriously, everyone read Damian's "Seven Deadly Sins" thing, if ya
haven't read/heard it already.
