Larry Wall wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 08:40:12AM -0700, Dave Whipp wrote:
That said, the semantics of a chained relop really should work correctly
for this. If you only reference a junction once in an expression, then
it should behave as such: {a
Yes, that is the intent. I consi
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, John Macdonald wrote:
> If I understand correctly, (which is by no means assured) a function
> call with a junction as an argument generally acts as if it were
> autothreaded. So:
>
> $x = any(1,2,3);
> $y = f($x);
>
> should work like:
>
> $y = any( f(1),
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 08:40:12AM -0700, Dave Whipp wrote:
> That said, the semantics of a chained relop really should work correctly
> for this. If you only reference a junction once in an expression, then
> it should behave as such: {a
HaloO,
John Macdonald wrote:
Unless autothreading is also implied by conditionals, $y
and $z would have significantly different results; $y ===
any(undef,undef,undef) while $z === any(1,2,3).
This is why I'm opting for statical analysis of auto-threaded
conditionals.
But, if
autothreading
Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Thinking about Jon Lang's -1|+1 example in another way, I wondered about
simultaneous conditions.
Consider
$x = any (1,2,5,6)
How do we compose a conditional that asks if any of this set of
eigenstates are simultaneously both > 2 and < 5?
Clearly the desired answer
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:44:43AM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> The idea is that junctions should usually be invisible to the code,
> and autothreading handles them behind the scenes. [ ... ]
If I understand correctly, (which is by no means assured) a function
call with a junction as an argument
The idea is that junctions should usually be invisible to the code,
and autothreading handles them behind the scenes. Once you start
using the eigenstates as a collection, you're breaking the model and
not gaining anything over just using a regular collection type.
But the "behind the scenes"
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Richard Hainsworth
wrote:
> Thinking about Jon Lang's -1|+1 example in another way, I wondered about
> simultaneous conditions.
>
> Consider
>
> $x = any (1,2,5,6)
>
> How do we compose a conditional that asks if any of this set of eigenstates
> are simultaneously
Richard (>):
> Consider
>
> $x = any (1,2,5,6)
>
> How do we compose a conditional that asks if any of this set of eigenstates
> are simultaneously both > 2 and < 5?
> Clearly the desired answer for $x is False, but
>
> my $x = any(1,2,5,6); say ?( 2 < $x < 5); # true
>
> Is there some combination
