Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Sex, 2009-03-20 às 14:08 +0100, Jonathan Worthington escreveu:
It's probably a minor issue, but part of me wants Junction to be OK too
for explaining stuff. Telling people the default parameter type is Any,
to accept anything they can write Object and to accept just ju
Em Sex, 2009-03-20 às 14:08 +0100, Jonathan Worthington escreveu:
> It's probably a minor issue, but part of me wants Junction to be OK too
> for explaining stuff. Telling people the default parameter type is Any,
> to accept anything they can write Object and to accept just junctions
> you writ
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Qua, 2009-03-18 às 18:50 -0700, Larry Wall escreveu:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:32:18PM -0700, Jon Lang wrote:
: > +method !eigenstates (Junction $j: --> List)
:
: Shouldn't that be lowercase-j junction?
Maybe, though there might be a Junction role involved for su
Em Qua, 2009-03-18 às 18:50 -0700, Larry Wall escreveu:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:32:18PM -0700, Jon Lang wrote:
> : > +method !eigenstates (Junction $j: --> List)
> :
> : Shouldn't that be lowercase-j junction?
> Maybe, though there might be a Junction role involved for subtype
> matches l
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:32:18PM -0700, Jon Lang wrote:
: > + method !eigenstates (Junction $j: --> List)
:
: Shouldn't that be lowercase-j junction?
Maybe, though there might be a Junction role involved for subtype
matches like that one.
Larry
> + method !eigenstates (Junction $j: --> List)
Shouldn't that be lowercase-j junction?
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
