Re: r25102 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-01 Thread Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
On 2009 Jan 30, at 11:30, Larry Wall wrote: So I'm open to suggestions for what we ought to call that envelope if we don't call it the prelude or the perlude. Locale is bad, environs is bad, context is bad...the wrapper? But we have dynamic wrappers already, so that's bad. Maybe the setting, l

Re: r25102 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-31 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:11:42AM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:30:25AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: > > So anyway, just because other languages call it a prelude doesn't > > mean that we have to. Perl is the tail that's always trying to > > wag the dog... > > > > Wha

Re: r25102 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-30 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:30:25AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: > So anyway, just because other languages call it a prelude doesn't > mean that we have to. Perl is the tail that's always trying to > wag the dog... > > What is the sound of one tail wagging? For my dog Sally, the sound of one tail wag

Re: r25102 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-30 Thread Jon Lang
Larry Wall wrote: > So I'm open to suggestions for what we ought to call that envelope > if we don't call it the prelude or the perlude. Locale is bad, > environs is bad, context is bad...the wrapper? But we have dynamic > wrappers already, so that's bad. Maybe the setting, like a jewel? > That

Re: r25102 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-30 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Larry Wall wrote: > We want something that comes > outside your program, that is, a lexical scope that *surrounds* the > file scope. We don't have a good word for that: circumlude? ambilude? >[...] > Or we could go with a more linguistic contextual metaphor. A

Re: r25102 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-30 Thread Larry Wall
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:49:13AM +0100, Carl Mäsak wrote: : Mark (>), Moritz (>>), Larry via commit bot (>>>): : >>> +PERL# Lexical symbols in the standard "perlude" : >> : >> Did you mean "prelude" instead? : > : > I took the quotation marks to indicate an intentional : > misspelling

Re: r25102 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-30 Thread Carl Mäsak
Mark (>), Moritz (>>), Larry via commit bot (>>>): >>> +PERL# Lexical symbols in the standard "perlude" >> >> Did you mean "prelude" instead? > > I took the quotation marks to indicate an intentional > misspelling/coinage: "perl" + "prelude" = "perlude". At which point one might ask o

Re: r25102 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-29 Thread Mark J. Reed
I took the quotation marks to indicate an intentional misspelling/coinage: "perl" + "prelude" = "perlude". On 1/29/09, Moritz Lenz wrote: > pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote: >> +PERL# Lexical symbols in the standard "perlude" > > Did you mean "prelude" instead? > > Moritz > --

Re: r25102 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-01-28 Thread Moritz Lenz
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote: > +PERL# Lexical symbols in the standard "perlude" Did you mean "prelude" instead? Moritz