On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:46:29PM +0100, Juerd wrote:
: Larry Wall skribis 2005-03-16 9:41 (-0800):
: > Except that q:meta would be an upgrade in terms of specialness,
: > and besides, it's inside out from what you want, which is to quote
: > a particular argument to a string interpolation, not t
Larry Wall skribis 2005-03-16 9:41 (-0800):
> Except that q:meta would be an upgrade in terms of specialness,
> and besides, it's inside out from what you want, which is to quote
> a particular argument to a string interpolation, not the entire
> interpolation. It just wants to be a miscellaneous
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:17:33AM +, Richard Proctor wrote:
: On Wed 16 Mar, Rod Adams wrote:
: > I vote for axing C in favor of C and C.
: >
:
: Given A05 states that bare scalars match literally, quotemeta is (almost?)
: obsolete. It can certainly be downgraded.
Except that q:meta would
On Wed 16 Mar, Rod Adams wrote:
> I vote for axing C in favor of C and C.
>
Given A05 states that bare scalars match literally, quotemeta is (almost?)
obsolete. It can certainly be downgraded.
Richard
--
Personal [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.waveney.org
Telecoms [EMAIL PROT
