Larry Wall writes:
> Or maybe we just stick with what we already allow:
>
> my $name = 'add';
> my $code = q[
> sub \qq[$name] ($left, $right) {
> return $left + $right;
>}
> ];
>
> After all, that's why we put \q interpolation into '' in the first place.
Ahh
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:56:49 -0800, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or maybe we just stick with what we already allow:
>
> my $name = 'add';
> my $code = q[
> sub \qq[$name] ($left, $right) {
> return $left + $right;
> }
> ];
>
> After all, that's w
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:41:37AM -0500, Matt Diephouse wrote:
: So... maybe we can pass a parameter saying what we want to use to interpolate?
:
: my $name = 'add';
: my $code = q:c<«>[
: sub «$name» ($left, $right) {
: return $left + $right;
:}
: ];
: # prints "
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 00:22:25 +, Jonathan Paton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim,
>
> > qq:i {} is just like qq{} except that when it interpolates variables,
> > those which are undefined are preserved literally.
>
> Interesting idea except for the flaw.
I think we almost have something like
Jim,
> qq:i {} is just like qq{} except that when it interpolates variables,
> those which are undefined are preserved literally.
I think surprise might be a problem. E.g.
my $index = 0;
eval qq:i {
my @array = A .. Z;
sub example {
for my $index (0 .. $#array) {
John Macdonald wrote:
The problem with "interpolate if you can or leave it alone for
later" is that when later comes around you're in a quandry.
Is the string "$var" that is in the final result there because
it was "$var" in the original and couldn't be interpolated,
or was it a $foo that had its v
Jim Cromie writes:
> since the qq:X family has recently come up, Id like to suggest another.
>
> qq:i {} is just like qq{} except that when it interpolates variables,
> those which are undefined are preserved literally.
So then when doing maintenance on some code I can break it by
introducing a
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 05:54:45PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Jim Cromie writes:
> >
> > since the qq:X family has recently come up, Id like to suggest another.
> >
> > qq:i {} is just like qq{} except that when it interpolates variables,
> > those which are undefined are preserved literally.
>
Jim Cromie writes:
>
> since the qq:X family has recently come up, Id like to suggest another.
>
> qq:i {} is just like qq{} except that when it interpolates variables,
> those which are undefined are preserved literally.
Eeeew. Probably going to shoot this down. But let's see where you're
go
Jim Cromie skribis 2004-11-30 16:53 (-0700):
>my @args = @{$template{args}};
>my $body = $template{body};
>eval sub qq:i{
> my ($self, @args) = @_;
> $body;
>}
Please explain what you want it to do with @args there.
Juerd
10 matches
Mail list logo
