Bart Lateur wrote:
>
> If you say
>
> keys %hash = 200;
>
> then `%hash' will have at least 200 buckets allocated for
> it--256 of them, in fact, since it rounds up to the next power
> of two.
This should go away, of course.
--
John Porter
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000 10:23:27 -0400, John Porter wrote:
>> keys %HASH = LIST;
>>
>> is really
>>
>> @HASH{ LIST } = ();
>
>Sure. Would you have any great objection to adding the alternative syntax?
I have some doubts. See perlfunc -f keys, from which I quote:
If you say
k
>> keys %HASH = LIST;
>> is really
>> @HASH{ LIST } = ();
>Sure. Would you have any great objection to adding the alternative syntax?
Nope.
--tom
