> "LP" == Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> on boston.pm a thread arose about having named subs inside subs. of
>> course perl5 can do it but they don't do anything useful but they do
>> have some odd implemenation defined closure behavior.
>>
>> someone brought up lisp and
> on boston.pm a thread arose about having named subs inside subs. of
> course perl5 can do it but they don't do anything useful but they do
> have some odd implemenation defined closure behavior.
>
> someone brought up lisp and scheme and how they do it (differently from
> each other).
>
> well,