On -1 xxx -1, it was written:
>
> I have a wish for Perl6. I think it would be nice to have the possibility
> for more than one modifier after a simple statement.
Larry's ruled that it's one statement modifier per statement, period. For
anything else you'd need to modify the grammar. (Which won
Juerd writes:
> StÃphane Payrard skribis 2004-06-25 16:15 (-0400):
> > It is unpossible to stack loop modifiers without adding
> > conventions denoting the iterators.
>
> Is it really? I've always thought this would be useful enough:
>
> say .{foo} for @$_ for @foo;
>
> Although that can pro
Stéphane Payrard skribis 2004-06-25 16:15 (-0400):
> It is unpossible to stack loop modifiers without adding
> conventions denoting the iterators.
Is it really? I've always thought this would be useful enough:
say .{foo} for @$_ for @foo;
Although that can probably just be written as:
s
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 03:38:51PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>Hello,
>
> I have a wish for Perl6. I think it would be nice to have the possibility
> for more than one modifier after a simple statement.
>
> For example:
>
>print $a+$b if $a if $b for 1..3;
>
>
> Gerd P
Please configure your email client correctly.
(I'm surprised that the message was accepted, even)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skribis 2004-06-25 13:38 (-):
> I have a wish for Perl6. I think it would be nice to have the possibility
> for more than one modifier after a simple statement.
Has been di
