On Monday 23 July 2001 14:05, Dave Storrs wrote:
> No, I do not mean something like Devel::DProf; that is a
> module. I mean something that is in the core binary, the same way that
> the perl debugger is in the core binary.
Except that the perl debugger is not in the perl binary. There
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 02:47:43PM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
>
>>I discovered today that I had forgotten to put 'use strict' at the top of
>>one of my modules...it was in the script that _used_ the module, but not
>>in the module itself. Putting it in instantly caught
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:47:43 -0700 (PDT), Dave Storrs wrote:
>I discovered today that I had forgotten to put 'use strict' at the top of
>one of my modules...it was in the script that _used_ the module, but not
>in the module itself. Putting it in instantly caught several annoying
>bugs that I'd
At 02:47 PM 7/21/2001 -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
>Second topic:
>
>The debugger API PDD that I submitted a couple of days ago suggested that
>we incorporate a profiler into the core. What do people think of this
>idea?
A simple version will probably be included--I expect to hack one together
for
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 10:56:41AM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> A good point. There should definitely be a clean API so that
> other people can develop their own profilers which could then be plugged
> in. This still leaves the question though...should core provide a default
> profiler?
Wh
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Johan Vromans wrote:
> Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I discovered today that I had forgotten to put 'use strict' at the top of
> > one of my modules...it was in the script that _used_ the module, but not
> > in the module itself. Putting it in instantly ca
> "DS" == Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> A good point. There should definitely be a clean API so that
DS> other people can develop their own profilers which could then be
DS> plugged in. This still leaves the question though...should core
DS> provide a default profile
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 02:47:43PM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
>
> > It would be nice if there was a
> >
> > use strict 'recursive';
> >
> > option that you could set in a script or module (package, whatever) which
> > would force all the mod
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Dan Brian wrote:
> > The debugger API PDD that I submitted a couple of days ago suggested that
> > we incorporate a profiler into the core. What do people think of this
> > idea?
>
> I think that with a clean API, many third-party profilers could and would
> be created. I
Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I discovered today that I had forgotten to put 'use strict' at the top of
> one of my modules...it was in the script that _used_ the module, but not
> in the module itself. Putting it in instantly caught several annoying
> bugs that I'd been trying to tr
> "DS" == Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> Second topic:
DS> The debugger API PDD that I submitted a couple of days ago suggested that
DS> we incorporate a profiler into the core. What do people think of this
DS> idea?
only if it can be shut off with no penalty. that may
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 02:47:43PM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> I discovered today that I had forgotten to put 'use strict' at the top of
> one of my modules...it was in the script that _used_ the module, but not
> in the module itself. Putting it in instantly caught several annoying
> bugs that I
> The debugger API PDD that I submitted a couple of days ago suggested that
> we incorporate a profiler into the core. What do people think of this
> idea?
I think that with a clean API, many third-party profilers could and would
be created. I am skeptical of the value of putting it in the core,
13 matches
Mail list logo
