Re: Virtual methods

2005-05-26 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 09:11, Piers Cawley wrote: > Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > There are many gotchas that fall out of that. For example, you might > > have a special role that overrides .print to handle structured data, so > > your code says: > > > > my Foo $obj; > > giv

Re: Virtual methods

2005-05-25 Thread Piers Cawley
Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 10:51, Luke Palmer wrote: > >> Except that mixins like this always treat things as "virtual". >> Whenever you mixin a role at runtime, Perl creates an empty, anonymous >> subclass of the current class and mixes the role in that cla

Re: Virtual methods

2005-05-18 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 10:51, Luke Palmer wrote: > Except that mixins like this always treat things as "virtual". > Whenever you mixin a role at runtime, Perl creates an empty, anonymous > subclass of the current class and mixes the role in that class. Since > roles beat superclasses, you'll alwa

Re: Virtual methods

2005-05-18 Thread Luke Palmer
On 5/18/05, Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In Perl 6, I don't think we need to tag methods as "virtual" like C++ > does, since we have the handy yadda, yadda to do that for us. > > However, there is a variant of C++'s virtual that I'd love to see. By > default a role cannot override th