Paul Hodges wrote:
But on this general note, is there any current organization or location
where small problems are being parcelled out? I'd love to help, but my
time is as limited as everyone's If I could get small bites of work
to do, maybe I could contribute something useful.
Anyone reque
It also helps that you consistently make incisive observations and
contributions to conversations, even if they are a little tart
sometimes. :)
But on this general note, is there any current organization or location
where small problems are being parcelled out? I'd love to help, but my
time is as
duh. I'll learn to finish reading all the posts before adding my own
*someday*.
--- Darren Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:23 AM +0300 12/11/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> >Darren Duncan wrote:
> >>At 9:04 AM +0300 12/10/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> >>>Equally, Something to replace
At 10:23 AM +0300 12/11/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Darren Duncan wrote:
At 9:04 AM +0300 12/10/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Equally, Something to replace CGI or DBI will be essential to the
uptake of P6. I would far prefer to have a skilled and resourceful
professional, such as yourself or
On Sunday 09 December 2007 22:04:30 Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> I download pugs and parrot from
> SVN repositories, written tests - one of which still hangs the
> compilation of pugs. Indeed the test I wrote for pugs concerned the
> ability of pugs to use existing CPAN modules. I have tried parro
A great relief. Fantastic.
Where should I be looking to see what is happening. Is there some form
of coordination of this module writing activity?
Darren Duncan wrote:
At 9:04 AM +0300 12/10/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Equally, Something to replace CGI or DBI will be essential to the
uptak
At 9:04 AM +0300 12/10/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Equally, Something to replace CGI or DBI will be essential to the
uptake of P6. I would far prefer to have a skilled and resourceful
professional, such as yourself or Damian Conway write these modules
than leave it to enthusiastic amateurs su
Why thank you Mr. Chromatic!
In between all my other activities, I have been trolling along this list
from its inception, and followed eagerly every Appocalpse, Exegisis and
Synopsis as soon as they came on line. I download pugs and parrot from
SVN repositories, written tests - one of which st
On Saturday 08 December 2007 06:50:48 Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Surely, some concentrated thought by the inventive and resouceful minds of
> who lead this project should go into language utilisation and
> popularisation.
My goodness, @Larry's pretty darn busy trying to build the core kernel of
Larry Wall wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:43:25PM -0800, Peter Scott wrote:
: I do feel strongly that we need some sort of solution to this so that Perl
: 6 is not merely an outstanding framework that leaves all domain-specific
: extensions to the end user.
Perl 6 as a language doesn't addres
Larry Wall wrote:
Now, it might well be that a Perl standards body could specify a
mininum suggested set of modules for any distribution to enhance
interoperability, but we haven't got to that point yet, I don't think.
This would be great though!!
Even if it is afterward, it is still a lot b
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:43:25PM -0800, Peter Scott wrote:
: I do feel strongly that we need some sort of solution to this so that Perl
: 6 is not merely an outstanding framework that leaves all domain-specific
: extensions to the end user.
Perl 6 as a language doesn't address this (except to ke
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:09:48PM +, Smylers wrote:
: This isn't something which needs to influence language design -- in the
: sense that it doesn't need to be sorted before the design can be final
: and Perl 6 released.
Well, and to the extent that it needs to influence language design, it
Peter Scott writes:
> I do feel strongly that we need some sort of solution to this so that
> Perl 6 is not merely an outstanding framework that leaves all
> domain-specific extensions to the end user.
OK.
> Can we find a way to make and maintain some recommendations in a way
> that people can f
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:57:58 -0700, David Green wrote:
> Part of a solution is search.cpan.org -- if you can figure out which
> of the 870 XML modules will be useful to you. Another part is asking
> on newsgroups or lists -- if you can figure out which of the 870
> opinions offered is knowledge
On Nov 30, 2007 10:57 AM, David Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe some kind of "Advisory Board" would help, where people (who
> might be experts in various ways) can offer informed recommendations
> on what modules make a good fit for what circumstances. Ultimately,
> if this is something w
16 matches
Mail list logo
