On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> Aaron Sherman wrote:
>
>> See below for the S06 section I'm referring to.
>>
>> I'm wondering how we should be reading the description of user-defined
>> operators. For example, "sub infix:<(c)>" doesn't describe
>> the precedence leve
Aaron Sherman wrote:
See below for the S06 section I'm referring to.
I'm wondering how we should be reading the description of user-defined
operators. For example, "sub infix:<(c)>" doesn't describe
the precedence level of this new op, so how is it parsed? Is there a
default?
The default is
