Steve Fink writes:
> What about updating RFCs? Should I increment the version number and send
> each new revision to perl-rfc? Do I need to be careful about the RFC
> number when submitting updates?
Yes and yes.
> Also, I assumed the intention of the RFCs was to stimulate focused
> discussion an
What about updating RFCs? Should I increment the version number and send
each new revision to perl-rfc? Do I need to be careful about the RFC
number when submitting updates?
Also, I assumed the intention of the RFCs was to stimulate focused
discussion and to keep a record of the decisions made du
At 08:27 AM 8/3/00 -0400, Tad McClellan wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:09:04PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> > I'm about to push the button that will send my private set of RFCs
> > off to the archive and mail them to perl6-announce. Fingers crossed.
> >
> > The RFC archive is at http://
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:09:04PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> I'm about to push the button that will send my private set of RFCs
> off to the archive and mail them to perl6-announce. Fingers crossed.
>
> The RFC archive is at http://tmtowtdi.perl.org/rfc/
I suggest we zero-pad the RFC
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:09:04PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> In the future, if you want to submit an RFC mail it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] only. The automated process will send it to
> the correct list as well as to -announce. This will also prevent
> perl6-librarian being CC:ed on followup
Jonathan Scott Duff writes:
> > In the future, if you want to submit an RFC mail it to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] only.
>
> http://tmtowtdi.perl.org/rfc/meta/ says that you should send your RFCs to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They go to the same place. However, I meant to onl
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:09:04PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> I'm about to push the button that will send my private set of RFCs
> off to the archive and mail them to perl6-announce. Fingers crossed.
Hooray!!
> If I've forgotten your RFC, please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In the f
