Aaron J Mackey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> proposed:
>
> @b = pop @a, $n;
That will change the behaviour of this perl5 code:
foo(pop @a, "bar")
If we do this then the code above need to be fixed by the perl5->perl6
filter.
Regards,
Gisle
proposed:
@b = pop @a, $n;
should this be equivalent to:
@b = splice @a, -$n; # no longer a LIFO queue
or :
@b = reverse splice @a, -$n; # still a LIFO queue
I guess it all depends on what you then do with @b, but you get my drift.
This should be addressed, one way or another.
-Aaron
PRL>3) C would then act as C and C would
PRL> act as C
I'll take door #3, Jonathan.
--
Chaim FrenkelNonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
