On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:33:01PM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> Michael G Schwern wrote:
> >
> > perl6-internals is probably the wrong forum for this, it was just
> > convenient. I think Dan's got the right idea, distribute a Taint
> > module with Perl.
>
> I'm not sure what's happened on -inte
Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> perl6-internals is probably the wrong forum for this, it was just
> convenient. I think Dan's got the right idea, distribute a Taint
> module with Perl.
I'm not sure what's happened on -internals, but early on in
perl6-language I suggested something similar, and Lar
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 04:01:11PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >Anyhow, however these extra tainting functions are implemented is fine
> >(as long as they work). The simplest thing would be to just merge and
> >patch up Taint.pm and distribute it with perl6.
>
> Yup. I know Tom wanted an all-pe
At 03:43 PM 9/15/00 -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:00:04PM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
> > I'm kinda surfing the edge here. -T is definately an internals issue,
> > but $TAINT? taint()? is_tainted()?
> >
> > I'm not sure if they should be exposed into the language fro
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:00:04PM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
> I'm kinda surfing the edge here. -T is definately an internals issue,
> but $TAINT? taint()? is_tainted()?
>
> I'm not sure if they should be exposed into the language from the
> internals, or if a superstudly taint.xs in stdlib i
