Tom Christiansen wrote:
>
> >"symbol $main::x used only once" -> "use of uninitialized variable
> >$main::x"
> >"use of uninitialized value" -> "use of undefined value"
>
> Perhaps then
>
> "use of uninitialized value" -> "use of undef as discrete value"
> or
> "use of uninitialized val
Updated RFC.
---
=head1 TITLE
variable usage warnings
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for now
Date: 2 Aug 2000
Version: 0.2 (unreleased)
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: (unassigned)
=head1 ABSTRACT
"VARIABLE used only once:
>. You misunderstand; I am *not* addressing the
>perennial complaint that the "use of uninitialized value" doesn't
>identify the source of the undefined value.
Ok.
>"symbol $main::x used only once" -> "use of uninitialized variable
>$main::x"
>"use of uninitialized value" -> "use of undefined v
Tom Christiansen wrote:
>
> >The warning message "use of uninitialized value" should also
> >disappear, to be replaced with "use of undefined value", and the
> >warning for the purpose described in this RFC should be "use of
> >uninitialized variable C<$x>".
>
> What about if there's only an exp
>The warning message "use of uninitialized value" should also
>disappear, to be replaced with "use of undefined value", and the
>warning for the purpose described in this RFC should be "use of
>uninitialized variable C<$x>".
What about if there's only an expr, not a variable?
For example:
p
