David K Storrs wrote:
Hmmm...This doesn't seem to have particularly grabbed the popular
imagination among the Perl6 crowd.
Well, I think it's the Perl5 crowd that is in much more need
of having its imagination grabbed. :-)
[big snip]
Anyway, I very much like your ideas. (And Juerd's suggesti
David K Storrs wrote:
Hmmm...This doesn't seem to have particularly grabbed the popular
imagination among the Perl6 crowd.
Well, I think it's the Perl5 crowd that is in much more need
of having its imagination grabbed. :-)
[big snip]
Anyway, I very much like your ideas. (And Juerd's suggesti
David K Storrs wrote:
Hmmm...This doesn't seem to have particularly grabbed the popular
imagination among the Perl6 crowd.
Well, I think it's the Perl5 crowd that is in much more need
of having its imagination grabbed. :-)
[big snip]
Anyway, I very much like your ideas. (And Juerd's suggesti
At 11:34 -0400 5/7/06, David K Storrs wrote:
>Hmmm...This doesn't seem to have particularly grabbed the popular imagination
>among the Perl6 crowd.
I'm a lurker here, mostly interested in keeping perl 6 usable for mathematics
and physics, but unable to keep up with most of the things I read.
W
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:59:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but also people on the semi-inside, trying to remember things like
> "I'm sure there's a reason other then C<< if condition_without_parens
> {block} >> that we can't have C<< %foo {'bar'} >> DTRT, but I can't
> remember it
On May 4, 2006, at 10:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:44:29AM -0400, David K Storrs wrote:
Also, the page should talk about why it is difficult to do what is
being done. Ask the reader questions: "You want to . How do you do it?" Then offer up an analysis of vari
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:44:29AM -0400, David K Storrs wrote:
> Also, the page should talk about why it is difficult to do what is
> being done. Ask the reader questions: "You want to continuations / have coroutines / embedd yacc in your language /
> whatever>. How do you do it?" Then of
