Steve (>):
"If you declare a lexical twice in the same scope, it is the same lexical"
I would argue for: If you declare a lexical twice in the same scope, it is an
error!
I agree.
Enforcing one and only one declaration feels like a Good Thing, for
Juerd's reasons. With me, multiple 'my' for
Steve Lukas skribis 2006-09-11 4:35 (-0700):
> "If you declare a lexical twice in the same scope, it is the same lexical"
> I would argue for: If you declare a lexical twice in the same scope,
> it is an error!
I agree.
The reason that I love "my $foo" is that it always gives me a new
variable.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:35:08AM -0700, Steve Lukas wrote:
>
> I would argue for: If you declare a lexical twice in the same scope, it is an
> error!
>
> Well, this error happens most likely due to my tiredness and I want the
> compiler to wake me up.
> This can be important because I would
