Either way it seems logical to implement it using Sets, or at least
extract the core uniquification logic and share it with Set.
So what do/should these methods do if passed a function of indeterminate arity?
On 9/8/08, Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Damian Conway wrote:
>> Moritz Le
Damian Conway wrote:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>
>> There are some tests for List.uniq in the test suite, and pugs
>> implements it, but it's not in S29.
>> Damian seems to have though we should have it.
>> So should we have it?
>
> I still think we should. If only because I've seen it re-(mis)-imple
Moritz Lenz wrote:
There are some tests for List.uniq in the test suite, and pugs
implements it, but it's not in S29.
Damian seems to have though we should have it.
So should we have it?
I still think we should. If only because I've seen it re-(mis)-implemented so
many times.
I'd also sugg
