On 09/30/2013 02:16 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0800, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Not wising to disagree with PM, but "|docs/feather/syn_index.html"
states on line 1:|
"The Synopsis documents are to be taken as the formal specification
for Perl 6 implementatio
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0800, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Not wising to disagree with PM, but "|docs/feather/syn_index.html"
> states on line 1:|
> "The Synopsis documents are to be taken as the formal specification
> for Perl 6 implementations"
What follows is just my opinion, there's
Not wising to disagree with PM, but "|docs/feather/syn_index.html"
states on line 1:|
"The Synopsis documents are to be taken as the formal specification for
Perl 6 implementations"
I have seen elsewhere, can't remember where, that the parser written by
Larry is also considered a part of the s
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:28:48PM +0800, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> However, the Synopses are now primary specification and the
> Apocalypses have only historical significance. Also there are more
> Synopses than Apocalypses.
One correction: The test suite ("roast") is the primary specification
Hi Richard,
On 09/29/2013 07:28 AM, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Some suggestions about documentation.
>
> Originally the Synopses were implementation oriented sumaries of the
> previous description base Apocalypses. That meant that the Synopses were
> derivative and secondary to the Apocalypses
