At 7:25 AM -0700 4/11/02, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Dan" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Dan> (Or maybe attributed string eval, like:
>
>Dan> $foo = eval.Parrot set I0, 12
>Dan> sub I0, I0, 5
>Dan> EOP
>
>That would make more sense
> "Dan" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dan> (Or maybe attributed string eval, like:
Dan> $foo = eval.Parrot sub I0, I0, 5
Dan>EOP
That would make more sense to me (for whatever that's worth) as
$foo = Parrot.eval < http:
great idea :")
I've just tried gnuCash program and think it is very cool (i've enjoyed to take
first steps in double-entry accounting, i was always wondering what the hell is this
:") )...
http://www.ncsysadmin.org/july2001/ncsa-gnucash-talk.html#toc1
(very entertaining intro :") )
Meanw
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 09:23 AM 4/10/2002 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
>>Okay, this is the beginnings of Scheme in Perl6. I'm sure there's
>>stuff I'm getting wrong. I've not written the parser yet for instance
>
> Very nice! Quite a sample, maybe Larry/Damian can use this
>
At 09:23 AM 4/10/2002 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
>Okay, this is the beginnings of Scheme in Perl6. I'm sure there's
>stuff I'm getting wrong. I've not written the parser yet for instance
Very nice! Quite a sample, maybe Larry/Damian can use this
in one of the next $(A,E)'s
> my SchemeExpr $.v
At 3:49 PM +0100 4/10/02, Piers Cawley wrote:
>Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Your idea at the end of regugitating the code back out as Parrot or Perl
>> is just slightly stunning on its own.
>
>I thought that was the easy bit. The compiler just (for appropriate
>values of 'just'
Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 10:03, Piers Cawley wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I wrote:
>> > [ A huge wodge of possible perl 6 code ]
>>
>> I'm getting that Warnock's Dilemma feeling here... Did I stun you
>> all into silence?
>
> On my clock, you
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 10:03, Piers Cawley wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I wrote:
> > [ A huge wodge of possible perl 6 code ]
>
> I'm getting that Warnock's Dilemma feeling here... Did I stun you all
> into silence?
On my clock, your original message arrived at 04:23, and your followu
At 3:03 PM +0100 4/10/02, Piers Cawley wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I wrote:
>> [ A huge wodge of possible perl 6 code ]
>
>I'm getting that Warnock's Dilemma feeling here... Did I stun you all
>into silence?
Nah. You just can't hear the people running away screaming from there. ;-P
-
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I wrote:
> [ A huge wodge of possible perl 6 code ]
I'm getting that Warnock's Dilemma feeling here... Did I stun you all
into silence?
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a re
10 matches
Mail list logo
