Larry Wall skribis 2005-03-15 11:20 (-0800):
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Juerd wrote:
> : Rod Adams skribis 2005-03-15 12:44 (-0600):
> : > %x.delete('foo');
> : > if %x.exists('foo') { ... }
> : Would renaming exists to has or hasa be a good idea, if it does indeed
> : exist only i
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Juerd wrote:
: Rod Adams skribis 2005-03-15 12:44 (-0600):
: > %x.delete('foo');
: > if %x.exists('foo') { ... }
:
: Would renaming exists to has or hasa be a good idea, if it does indeed
: exist only in method form?
I'd think that would be asking if the
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:44:06PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: What I'm asking is if we are going to continue allowing:
:
: delete %x;
: if exists %x { ... }
:
: or make it where you instead have to say
:
: %x.delete('foo');
: if %x.exists('foo') { ... }
They can always just be macros that tran
Rod Adams skribis 2005-03-15 12:44 (-0600):
> %x.delete('foo');
> if %x.exists('foo') { ... }
Would renaming exists to has or hasa be a good idea, if it does indeed
exist only in method form?
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html
http:/
Thomas Sandlaß wrote:
Rod Adams wrote:
How am I supposed to define a signature that says "A scalar that
refers to a hash or array element, but do not evaluate or autovivify
the element"?
I'll make a guess: Ref of Int of Array.
This assumes Int has a polymorphic subtype that allows
pointing into
Rod Adams wrote:
How am I supposed to define a signature that says "A scalar that refers
to a hash or array element, but do not evaluate or autovivify the element"?
I'll make a guess: Ref of Int of Array.
This assumes Int has a polymorphic subtype that allows
pointing into arrays. But unfortunatel
