Il giorno 02/mar/04, alle 04:12, Larry Wall ha scritto:
[...]
: Problem solved!!! ;-)
I think you prove my point. :-)
Very nice "certamen".
You would be probably thrilled by an italian Usenet poster I'm honoured
to know, who manually justifies every single post he writes. No extr
Tom Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:01:11AM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
>>: That's a *very* interesting idea. What do people think?
>
>>I think anyone who does full justification without proportional
>>spacing and hyphenation is severely lacking in empathy for
Il giorno 02/mar/04, alle 10:08, Stefano Rodighiero ha scritto:
[...]
Someone thinks Leonardo Serni is like Nicolad Bourbaki.
^^^
Oops. That was 'Nicolas'. Sorry.
Stefano
Il giorno 02/mar/04, alle 04:12, Larry Wall ha scritto:
[...]
: Problem solved!!! ;-)
I think you prove my point. :-)
Very nice "certamen".
You would be probably thrilled by an italian Usenet poster I'm honoured
to know, who manually justifies every single post he writes. No extr
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 12:42:28PM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
: Well, it really depends on how neatly
: one is able to write. It really isn't
: that hard to create a fully justified
: text that doesn't inflict pain on the
: reader. English is especially good in
: that regard, offering such a pleth
Larry observed:
I think anyone who does full justification without proportional
spacing and hyphenation is severely lacking in empathy for the reader.
Well, it really depends on how neatly
one is able to write. It really isn't
that hard to create a fully justified
text that doesn't inflict pain on
>On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:01:11AM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
>: That's a *very* interesting idea. What do people think?
>I think anyone who does full justification without proportional
>spacing and hyphenation is severely lacking in empathy for the reader.
>Ragged right is much easier on the ey
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:01:11AM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
: That's a *very* interesting idea. What do people think?
I think anyone who does full justification without proportional
spacing and hyphenation is severely lacking in empathy for the reader.
Ragged right is much easier on the eyes--s
Damian Conway wrote:
Richard Nuttall suggested:
An alternative is to have "fill rightmost gaps" and "fill leftmost
gaps" on
alternate lines. This produces more balanced looking columns, so
they don't all look heavier on the left.
That's a *very* interesting idea. What do people think?
The Ve
Richard Nuttall suggested:
An alternative is to have "fill rightmost gaps" and "fill leftmost gaps" on
alternate lines. This produces more balanced looking columns, so they
don't all look heavier on the left.
That's a *very* interesting idea. What do people think?
For example:
Now is the w
Damian Conway wrote:
Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
In the section "He doth fill fields..." we see an example of Fill
Justification where two spaces fit between every word. This doesn't
give us an idea of how spaces are distributed if the number of
spaces needed does not divide evenly into the number of
Damian --
Good. I don't remember where I first heard about doing it that way
vs. from the left, but the results going from the right to left
are typically better looking than from left to right, and I use that
way exclusively now.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 15:54, Damian Conway w
Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
In the section "He doth fill fields..." we see an example of Fill
Justification where two spaces fit between every word. This doesn't
give us an idea of how spaces are distributed if the number of
spaces needed does not divide evenly into the number of interstices.
Currently
13 matches
Mail list logo
