Re: E6: Small Junctions

2003-08-01 Thread Luke Palmer
> "Mark J. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Quick, dumb question: what is an "abjunction"? How does it differ > > from a junction? > > An abjuction requires that none of its members match. For example, > ($a == none(1,2,3)) is true for any value of $a except 1, 2 or 3. Actually, no :-) disjunc

Re: E6: Small Junctions

2003-08-01 Thread Luke Palmer
> In E6, Damian write: "A junction is a single scalar value that can act like > two or more values at once". > > Whenever I see a statement like this, I tend ask myself "What happenned to > zero and one?". Perhaps its intentional; perhaps its sloppy writing. What > issues arise with junctions of 0

Re: E6: Small Junctions

2003-08-01 Thread Dave Whipp
"Mark J. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Quick, dumb question: what is an "abjunction"? How does it differ > from a junction? An abjuction requires that none of its members match. For example, ($a == none(1,2,3)) is true for any value of $a except 1, 2 or 3. Dave.

Re: E6: Small Junctions

2003-08-01 Thread Mark J. Reed
On 2003-08-01 at 09:54:57, Dave Whipp wrote: > A junction on one element is almost always redundant, and can be cast > directly into the scalar that is its eigenstate. The only issue with doing > that is that certain junction methods might not be available. However, in > the case of a C, an abjunct