Markus Laire skribis 2005-02-16 13:32 (+0200):
> We already have +^ ~^ ?^ +| ~| ?| etc..
We have unary lc, int, etc...
> Why not allow data-type prefix for the comparison operators also, so
> we'd get, to mention a few, ~== (same as 'eq') ~< (same as 'lt') ~<=
> (same as 'le') - and of course b
Larry Wall wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 02:29:36PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
: Just a quick question. The prettyprinter of Pugs (the thing that
: handles the ".perl" method) currently prints out boolean true and
: false as #t and #f, which is obviously not correct.
:
: pugs> (1 > 2, 2 > 1
