On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 09:45:19PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:46:30PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > XML
> > is
> > much
> > too
> > verbose
>
> And it should be neither written nor read by people ;-)
Thank you, at least someone got my po
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:46:30PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>
> XML
> is
> much
> too
> verbose
And it should be neither written nor read by people ;-)
> .
>
>
--
Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pjcj.net
> do
>
> s%([A-Z]+)([BE])%<${\(($2 eq 'E')?'/':'')}$1>%g
>
> on that and you've almost got XML!
XML
is
much
too
verbose
.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
...
> This sounds like having also 'basic block' entry/exit opcodes. Hmmm.
>
> BLB = block begin
> BBB = basic block begin
> SE = statement end
> BBE = basic block end
> BLE = block end
>
> sub foo {
> BLB
> BBB
> my ($a, $b) = @_;
> S
