[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aldo Calpini) writes:
> any (possibly meaningful) feedback will be very appreciated.
I think Type should be called Value, and that arrays should possibly be a
mixin of lists, but apart from that it looks fine. Oh, and you missed
out Grammars; and I don't know if macros are actua
Murat Ünalan wrote:
> A very good idea, but i am afraid that this ML isnt the right
> audience.
>
> PS: But before reinventing a wheel, i would like to suggest to
> adopt the .NET/Java object hierarchy.
uhm. either I am completely wrong or you are totally out
of track. I really don't understand w
