--
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:28:43
gpurdy wrote:
>All --
>
>A4 gives this example of C:
>
>for @foo -> $a, $b { ... } # "for @foo into $a and $b..."
>
>but, this seems more natural to me (and, it turns out, closer to the P5
>syntax for ill or good):
>
>for $a, $b <- @foo { ... } # "for
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 02:53 AM, Luke Palmer wrote:
If you're talking about your own C example, actually, this would
match it better:
grep $x <- @list { $x eq 3 }
But if you're talking about A4's:
grep @list -> $x { $x eq 3 }
Which is very close to (one of) the currently v
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:28:43 -0500
>
> A4 gives this example of C:
>
> for @foo -> $a, $b { ... } # "for @foo into $a and $b..."
>
> but, this seems more natural to me (and, it turns out, closer to the P5
> syntax for ill or good):
>
> for $a, $b <- @foo {
