Larry Wall wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:17:30PM +0200, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Hi,
I am currently reviewing bits of the spec surrounding multiple dispatch
and, of course, have a question or two (I'll probably have some more
later, as the dust settles in my head).
1) The spec s
"noncitizen" is the more appropriate term you are looking for I think
regards
steve
-Original Message-
From: chromatic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2008 04:03
To: Bob Rogers
Cc: perl6-language@perl.org
Subject: Re: A few multiple dispatch questions
On
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 15:25:47 Bob Rogers wrote:
>On Tuesday 05 August 2008 12:01:29 Larry Wall wrote:
>> I believe "veto" is giving the wrong idea here as something that
>> happens after the fact. What's the term for only allowing
>> "acceptable" candidates to put their names
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 12:01:29 Larry Wall wrote:
> I believe "veto" is giving the wrong idea here as something that
> happens after the fact. What's the term for only allowing "acceptable"
> candidates to put their names on the ballot?
"disenfranchise"
-- c
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:17:30PM +0200, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently reviewing bits of the spec surrounding multiple dispatch
> and, of course, have a question or two (I'll probably have some more
> later, as the dust settles in my head).
>
> 1) The spec says:
>
> --
>
HaloO,
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Does the "veto" take place once the multiple dispatch has given us a
candidate and we try to bind the parameters to the signature, or as part
of the multiple dispatch? For example, supposing I declare:
multi foo(Int $a;; Num $b) { ... } # 1
multi foo(Int $a;
