HaloO,
Juerd wrote:
Can you explain please what "outside-in" means to you?
TSa wrote:
BTW, does everybody expect more than one prefix numerifyer beeing
redundant or is there an idea of (+ (+ @foo)) beeing modelled
Juerd answered:
It's providing context to something that was already providi
Hi,
please configure your e-mail client to use "> " (greater-than, space)
for quoting, if possible. It currently uses ">" (greater-than).
TSa skribis 2005-09-26 13:43 (+0200):
> >>Why not define .chars like this:
> >> Context Return value
> >> itemamount of units
> >> list
HaloO,
Juerd wrote:
wolverian skribis 2005-09-24 13:45 (+0300):
Why not define .chars like this:
Context Return value
itemamount of units
listunits themselves
I still have my objections to this outside-in flow of type
information.
Originally I thought that .el
wolverian skribis 2005-09-24 13:45 (+0300):
> Why not define .chars like this:
> Context Return value
> itemamount of units
> listunits themselves
Agreed, of course.
> Originally I thought that .elems and .chars were symmetric and both
> should behave the same sema
