Re: [svn:perl6-synopsis] r9575 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2006-06-12 Thread David Romano
On 6/12/06, Daniel Hulme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -post-assigment forms such as C is allowed.) > > +post-assigment forms such as C are allowed. > s/allowed\./allowed)./ Umm, no. The ) was correct in its original position (after the full stop). It just seems to have disappeared. Yeah, my b

Re: [svn:perl6-synopsis] r9575 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2006-06-12 Thread Daniel Hulme
> > -post-assigment forms such as C is allowed.) > > +post-assigment forms such as C are allowed. > s/allowed\./allowed)./ Umm, no. The ) was correct in its original position (after the full stop). It just seems to have disappeared. -- Always crash crash crashWell come on and

Re: [svn:perl6-synopsis] r9575 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2006-06-12 Thread David Romano
On 6/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (Operators that imply list operations are excluded: C<@>, C<%>, and C, for instance. Hyper operators are also excluded, but -post-assigment forms such as C is allowed.) +post-assigment forms such as C are allowed. while the nits are bei