Re: 'We already have a "sub" keyword'

2001-06-27 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 05:30:02PM -0400, John Porter wrote: > David L. Nicol wrote: > > Yet another minor candidate for regularization. > > (Hush, David, Don't say that. Perl should stay Perl! ;-) Okay, I clearly missed out on some heated discussion about the ``Perl bleibt Perl'' RFC. I'll dive

Re: 'We already have a "sub" keyword'

2001-06-27 Thread John Porter
David L. Nicol wrote: > Yet another minor candidate for regularization. (Hush, David, Don't say that. Perl should stay Perl! ;-) -- John Porter