On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 06:33:07PM +1100, Jeremy Howard wrote:
> Can we extend RFC 282 so that it allows the right operand of C<..> to be
> omitted in any index, since the upper-bound can be implied? Or does it
> already propose this?
Yes, I wanted this to apply to all slices.
> (...in which cas
> =head1 TITLE
>
> Open-ended slices
>
<...>
>
> @thingy = function()
> for (@thingy[3..$#thingy]) { ... }
>
> Horrible, isn't it? People want something better.
>
> I thought about it last year or so, and produced a couple of patches. It
> seemed then that the right syntax was not, for ins
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Open-ended slices
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 24 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 282
Version: 1
Status: Developing
=head1 ABSTRACT
The dr
