Webmaster wrote:
> Both RFC 168 & 267 complain about the inability to override builtins. What
> if p6 simply require all user defined functions to be called using the &func
> syntax, and that builtins require the bareword syntax?
Uh, how does that result in overridability?
Sounds to me more lik
Both RFC 168 & 267 complain about the inability to override builtins. What
if p6 simply require all user defined functions to be called using the &func
syntax, and that builtins require the bareword syntax? This way any builtin
could be overridden and it would be immediately recognizable as an
ove
