Re: RFC: Request For New Pragma: Implicit

2000-08-03 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, Chaim Frenkel wrote: > Its my maintainence hat on. > > Picture some poor shmo, the regular guy is off on his two week vacation, > in some out the way place without his cell phone. And a production problem, > or the million dollar client, needs this yesterday. > > And he does

Re: RFC: Request For New Pragma: Implicit

2000-08-03 Thread Chaim Frenkel
Its my maintainence hat on. Picture some poor shmo, the regular guy is off on his two week vacation, in some out the way place without his cell phone. And a production problem, or the million dollar client, needs this yesterday. And he doesn't notice the use printvoidvalues. So the previous occ

Re: RFC: Request For New Pragma: Implicit

2000-08-02 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Wed, 02 Aug 2000, Chaim Frenkel wrote: > (Walks away shaking head, in wonder and amazement.) Hey, it took me two weeks to hack the parser into doing this at work. (Well, to some extent. It isn't module friendly.) But you may as well kill-file me now, 'cause there are sure to be more. My Pe

Re: RFC: Request For New Pragma: Implicit

2000-08-02 Thread Damian Conway
> Let me reiterate my view of pragmas. They can warp the language any > way you please, as long as they don't impact other modules. I wouldn't > even mind if someone wrote a pragma that lets you program Perl in Latin. Now you're just being silly! ;-) Damianus

Re: RFC: Request For New Pragma: Implicit

2000-08-02 Thread Larry Wall
Chaim Frenkel writes: : No. This sort of argument is not terrilby useful. Really, I don't see any big problem with the notion of the values of void expressions being sent somewhere, as long as it's lexically scoped, and doesn't rely on a global default filehandle. This kind of default output ha

Re: RFC: Request For New Pragma: Implicit

2000-08-02 Thread Chaim Frenkel
> "BCW" == Bryan C Warnock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BCW> =head1 ABSTRACT BCW> Perl 6 should add a new pragma called C. BCW> =head1 DESCRIPTION BCW> There should be an C pragma that gives new life and meaning to BCW> void context constructs. In my case, I want it to print to the default

Re: RFC: Request For New Pragma: Implicit

2000-08-02 Thread Piers Cawley
Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 08:54:27PM -0400, Bryan C.Warnock wrote: > > There should be an C pragma that gives new life and meaning to > > void context constructs. In my case, I want it to print to the default > > filehandle, (which is also implicit

Re: RFC: Request For New Pragma: Implicit

2000-08-01 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 08:54:27PM -0400, Bryan C.Warnock wrote: > There should be an C pragma that gives new life and meaning to > void context constructs. In my case, I want it to print to the default > filehandle, (which is also implicit, I might add.) Well, one of the rumors bandied about wa

RFC: Request For New Pragma: Implicit

2000-08-01 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
The librarian address doesn't seem to be working, so I'm injecting this here. =head1 TITLE Request For New Pragma: Implicit =head1 VERSION Maintainer: Bryan C. Warnock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 01 Aug 2000 Version: 1 Mailing List: perl6-language Number: TBD =head1 ABSTRACT