Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- "Joseph F. Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If the final design stays the way it is now, there really won't be
>> a "lexer". Instead, a perl6 grammar parses the data, and builds up
>> a huge match-object as it, well, matches. This match object
--- Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Except that none of the other ones exist in Perl 6. :^)
>
Thinking about this some more, and considering the desirability of lazy
evaluation, I think incremental execution might be the right way.
(Al
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Austin Hastings) writes:
> Let's support separable verbs.
That (http://dev.perl.org/perl6/rfc/309.html) is a really good idea.
--
Writing software is more fun than working.
--- Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Austin Hastings:
> # Let's support separable verbs.
> #
> # Here's how:
> #
> # # Note my arbitrary selection of _ as separation indicator.
> # Feel free to replace this with something more appropriate:
> #
> # sub if($test, &block)
> # _ elsif
Austin Hastings:
# Let's support separable verbs.
#
# Here's how:
#
# # Note my arbitrary selection of _ as separation indicator.
# Feel free to replace this with something more appropriate:
#
# sub if($test, &block)
# _ elsif ($test, &block) is optional is floating is multi
# _ elsun
