Dave Storrs said:
> On 3 May 2001, Ilya Martynov wrote:
> > >> You can serialize/deserilize object with Storable
> > >>
> > >> $foo = new Bar
> > >> store_fd $foo, \*SOCKET;
> > >>
> > >> and on the other end
> > >>
> > >> $foo = retrieve_fd \*SOCKET;
> > >> $foo->bar;
> > >>
> > >> It will work i
On 3 May 2001, Ilya Martynov wrote:
> >> You can serialize/deserilize object with Storable
> >>
> >> $foo = new Bar
> >> store_fd $foo, \*SOCKET;
> >>
> >> and on the other end
> >>
> >> $foo = retrieve_fd \*SOCKET;
> >> $foo->bar;
> >>
> >> It will work if you have Bar module on both ends.
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Dan Brian wrote:
> Another snippet from the .NET whitepaper:
>
>
> Everyone believes the Web will evolve, but for that evolution to be
> truly empowering for developers, businesses, and consumers, a radical new
> vision is needed. Microsoft's goal is to provide that vision
>> You can serialize/deserilize object with Storable
>>
>> $foo = new Bar
>> store_fd $foo, \*SOCKET;
>>
>> and on the other end
>>
>> $foo = retrieve_fd \*SOCKET;
>> $foo->bar;
>>
>> It will work if you have Bar module on both ends.
DS> Right, but I want it to work if you don't...
Then mayb
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:26:27PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> You are saying that the Clippy wasn't originally and truly annoying? :-)
Annoying enough to spawn vigor!
http://www.red-bean.com/~joelh/vigor/
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl
It's certainly a mistake to say "the goals of .NET", as if
they were a monolithic whole.
But the point is, some of the (technical) goals of .NET are
worthy, if not the slightest bit original; and so it should
not be a shame if some of Perl6's goals were collinear
with them. And I hope that ends
> "Don't Let Architecture Astronauts Scare You"
>
> http://joel.editthispage.com/stories/storyReader$320
This is a really good article. The quotes from MS and Sun whitepapers are
living proof that rarely are superior technical means being espoused.
Superior sales are the more likely culprit, esp
> -Original Message-
> From: Jarkko Hietaniemi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 5:26 PM
> To: David Grove
> Cc: Perl 6 Language Mailing List
> Subject: Re: .NET
>
>
> (still waiting
> > for "something original for a change&
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:22:26PM -0400, David Grove wrote:
> > > am seeing some similarities between some of the proposed goals of
> > > Perl 6 and the .NET platform.
> > > . . . many things in .NET have been discussed similarly here.
> >
> > That's because .NET attempts to address real-world is
> > am seeing some similarities between some of the proposed goals of
> > Perl 6 and the .NET platform.
> > . . . many things in .NET have been discussed similarly here.
>
> That's because .NET attempts to address real-world issues.
> The goals of .NET are not evil in and of themselves, you know.
At 09:30 PM 5/2/2001 +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote:
>DS> At 12:54 PM 5/2/2001 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> >> David Grove wrote:
> >> > distributed objects,
> >>
> >> I don't recall discussion of this wrt perl6, frankly.
>
>DS> I've mumbled about it on and off. I'd like to be able to do:
>
>DS>$f
DS> At 12:54 PM 5/2/2001 -0400, John Porter wrote:
>> David Grove wrote:
>> > distributed objects,
>>
>> I don't recall discussion of this wrt perl6, frankly.
DS> I've mumbled about it on and off. I'd like to be able to do:
DS>$foo = new Bar;
DS>print SOCKET serialze($foo);
DS> and on
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I'd like to be able to do:
>$foo = new Bar;
>print SOCKET serialze($foo);
> and on the other end do:
>$foo = unserialize();
>$foo->bar();
I personally am a big fan of Obliq semantics.
It's something I'd really like to see in perl.
--
John Porter
It's so my
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> I've mumbled about it on and off. I'd like to be able to do:
DS>$foo = new Bar;
DS>print SOCKET serialze($foo);
DS> and on the other end do:
DS>$foo = unserialize();
DS>$foo->bar();
DS> I don't know that
At 12:54 PM 5/2/2001 -0400, John Porter wrote:
>David Grove wrote:
> > distributed objects,
>
>I don't recall discussion of this wrt perl6, frankly.
I've mumbled about it on and off. I'd like to be able to do:
$foo = new Bar;
print SOCKET serialze($foo);
and on the other end do:
$foo
David Grove wrote:
> am seeing some similarities between some of the proposed goals of
> Perl 6 and the .NET platform.
> . . . many things in .NET have been discussed similarly here.
That's because .NET attempts to address real-world issues.
The goals of .NET are not evil in and of themselves, y
David Grove writes:
: Larry, et. al.: Is this similarity on purpose?
Yes, but only becase .NET is a VM, not because it's from MicroSoft.
The basic goal is to have a Perl VM that can sit easily on other VMs,
whether .NET's or Java's or our own. Another example of competing
by cooperating, which
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:51:03PM +0200, Willy wrote:
> Does anyone know how can i
[snip]
> How can i do??
You cannot do this in perl6 because perl6 does not yet exist.
Please do not abuse this mailing list with off-topic questions.
Thank you.
--
Tad McClellan
18 matches
Mail list logo
