On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:07:27PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
: On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 12:20:35AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: > That seems right to me. Or at least right associative. :-)
: >
: > In any event, right associativity seems more useful in this case.
:
: Okay, implemented as such.
:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 12:20:35AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> That seems right to me. Or at least right associative. :-)
>
> In any event, right associativity seems more useful in this case.
Okay, implemented as such.
Of the "non-chaining binaries" in S06:
=> but does cmp <=> .. ^.. ..^ ^
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 09:37:02PM -0600, Steve Peters wrote:
: On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:32:16AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:07:10PM +, osfameron wrote:
: > : >In Perl 6, C<< => >> is a fully-fledged anonymous object constructor
--
: > : >like C<[...]> and
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:32:16AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:07:10PM +, osfameron wrote:
> : >In Perl 6, C<< => >> is a fully-fledged anonymous object constructor --
> : >like C<[...]> and C<{...}>. The objects it constructs are called
> : >"pairs"
> : >
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:07:10PM +, osfameron wrote:
: >In Perl 6, C<< => >> is a fully-fledged anonymous object constructor --
: >like C<[...]> and C<{...}>. The objects it constructs are called
: >"pairs"
: >and they consist of a key (the left operand of the C<< => >>), and a
In Perl 6, C<< => >> is a fully-fledged anonymous object constructor --
like C<[...]> and C<{...}>. The objects it constructs are called
"pairs"
and they consist of a key (the left operand of the C<< => >>), and a
value
(the right operand).
Can pairs also be used to create linke
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:50:12PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
: On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 09:33:33PM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
: > In Perl 6, C<< => >> is a fully-fledged anonymous object constructor --
: > like C<[...]> and C<{...}>. The objects it constructs are called "pairs"
: > an
Steve Peters skribis 2005-02-21 8:08 (-0600):
> Great! I figured I was just missing something. As a followup, is there
> someplace where the raw Pod for the Apocalypses, Exegeses, and Synopses live.
> The Pod versions would be much easier to search in bulk than going through
> the web pages on
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 09:33:33PM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
> Steve Peters wrote:
>
> >While looking into Perl 6 and pugs, I noticed a problem with Pairs pretty
> >quickly. Although pairs look like a very useful data type, I could find
> >in the "Perl 6 and Parrot Essentials" or any Apocolyp
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 09:33:33PM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
> In Perl 6, C<< => >> is a fully-fledged anonymous object constructor --
> like C<[...]> and C<{...}>. The objects it constructs are called "pairs"
> and they consist of a key (the left operand of the C<< => >>), and a
>
Steve Peters wrote:
While looking into Perl 6 and pugs, I noticed a problem with Pairs pretty
quickly. Although pairs look like a very useful data type, I could find
in the "Perl 6 and Parrot Essentials" or any Apocolypse or other document
on how to get the key or value from a pair. I was think
Sorry if this email is nearly duplicated, but I may have had the wrong email
address on the firt email I sent.
While looking into Perl 6 and pugs, I noticed a problem with Pairs pretty
quickly. Although pairs look like a very useful data type, I could find
in the "Perl 6 and Parrot Essentials"
12 matches
Mail list logo
