Re: Protected data member access considered harmful

2008-04-07 Thread John M. Dlugosz
Thom Boyer thom-at-boyers.org |Perl 6| wrote: I believe Mr. Stroustrup's deprecation of 'protected' access applies only to data data members, not function members: Fortunately, you don't have to use protected data in C++; 'private' is the default in classes and is usually the better choice.

Protected data member access considered harmful

2008-04-07 Thread Thom Boyer
Larry Wall wrote: How private is private? I wonder if what you've called private things are really more like "protected" in C++ (accessible by the derived class) and that 'my' attributes are really private, as are submethods. It's all confused. Who is allowed to access what? >>