Re: Properties and stricture and capabilities

2001-06-09 Thread James Mastros
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David L. Nicol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 8:01 PM Subject: Re: Properties and stricture and capabilities > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:24:33PM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote: > > That would prevent further shoving of

Re: Properties and stricture and capabilities

2001-06-08 Thread schwern
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:24:33PM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote: > > Symbol table manipulation will work as long as your mucking about > > doesn't alter the strict class's signature. ie. you can shove a code > > ref onto the symbol table as long as a stub for that method was > > defined at compile

Re: Properties and stricture and capabilities

2001-06-07 Thread David L. Nicol
Michael G Schwern wrote: > Symbol table manipulation will work as long as your mucking about > doesn't alter the strict class's signature. ie. you can shove a code > ref onto the symbol table as long as a stub for that method was > defined at compile time. a read-only hash of any kind makes it