Re: Pre-withdrawal notice for RFC184

2000-09-19 Thread Dave Storrs
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On 19 Sep 2000 09:23:00 +0300, Ariel Scolnicov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm planning to withdraw RFC184 ("Perl should support an interactive > > mode"), due to lack of interest. There was little discussion of it, I seem to have m

Re: Pre-withdrawal notice for RFC184

2000-09-19 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:23:00AM +0300, Ariel Scolnicov wrote: > > I'm planning to withdraw RFC184 ("Perl should support an interactive > mode"), due to lack of interest. I'd say leave it in. What could it hurt? -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Pre-withdrawal notice for RFC184

2000-09-19 Thread H . Merijn Brand
On 19 Sep 2000 09:23:00 +0300, Ariel Scolnicov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm planning to withdraw RFC184 ("Perl should support an interactive > mode"), due to lack of interest. There was little discussion of it, > and the consensus seemed to be that C is "good enough" for > most purposes, a

Pre-withdrawal notice for RFC184

2000-09-18 Thread Ariel Scolnicov
I'm planning to withdraw RFC184 ("Perl should support an interactive mode"), due to lack of interest. There was little discussion of it, and the consensus seemed to be that C is "good enough" for most purposes, and C for all others. While I do not agree, it does mean there is no call for this R