On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2000 09:23:00 +0300, Ariel Scolnicov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm planning to withdraw RFC184 ("Perl should support an interactive
> > mode"), due to lack of interest. There was little discussion of it,
I seem to have m
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:23:00AM +0300, Ariel Scolnicov wrote:
>
> I'm planning to withdraw RFC184 ("Perl should support an interactive
> mode"), due to lack of interest.
I'd say leave it in. What could it hurt?
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19 Sep 2000 09:23:00 +0300, Ariel Scolnicov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm planning to withdraw RFC184 ("Perl should support an interactive
> mode"), due to lack of interest. There was little discussion of it,
> and the consensus seemed to be that C is "good enough" for
> most purposes, a
I'm planning to withdraw RFC184 ("Perl should support an interactive
mode"), due to lack of interest. There was little discussion of it,
and the consensus seemed to be that C is "good enough" for
most purposes, and C for all others. While I do not agree, it
does mean there is no call for this R