Peter Scott wrote:
> >Perl 5.6.0 has [[:lower:]] and [[:upper:]].
>
> Yes, but this one is worth a digraph. Question is, which one? Currently
> the free ones are:
>
> \F \h \H \i \I \j \J \k \K \m \M \o \O \q \R \T \v \V \y \Y
>
> \v \V are being debated on p5p currently.
>
> I s
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 08:55:27AM -0700, Peter Scott wrote:
> At 10:28 AM 8/10/00 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 05:21:44PM +0300, Jason Elbaum wrote:
> > > As far as I know, there is a basic bit of regexp functionality which
> > > Perl should support but doesn't.
> >
At 10:28 AM 8/10/00 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 05:21:44PM +0300, Jason Elbaum wrote:
> > As far as I know, there is a basic bit of regexp functionality which
> > Perl should support but doesn't.
> >
> > Perl regexps support the following features, though they're a bit
Jason Elbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perl regexps support the following features, though they're a bit
> obscure to my tastes...
>
> (from perlre:)
> \l lowercase next char (think vi)
Actually, this has little to do with regexes, it a string issue.
> ...but Perl doesn't offe
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 05:21:44PM +0300, Jason Elbaum wrote:
> As far as I know, there is a basic bit of regexp functionality which
> Perl should support but doesn't.
>
> Perl regexps support the following features, though they're a bit
> obscure to my tastes...
>
> (from perlre:)
> \l
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 17:21:44 +0300, Jason Elbaum wrote:
> \x match lowercase alpha char
>\X match uppercase alpha char
>
>Thus /\X\x*/ would match all capitalized words, while /\X+/ would match
>acronyms, and /(\X\x+)+/ would match Java class names.
You've got my vote, ap
As far as I know, there is a basic bit of regexp functionality which
Perl should support but doesn't.
Perl regexps support the following features, though they're a bit
obscure to my tastes...
(from perlre:)
\l lowercase next char (think vi)
\u uppercase next char (think
